Which of the following financing options typically has the least amount of borrower protection?

Subprime loans typically offer the least amount of borrower protection compared to the other financing options listed. These loans are designed for borrowers who have lower credit scores or less favorable credit histories, making it riskier for lenders. As a result, subprime loans often come with higher interest rates and less favorable terms than conventional, FHA, or VA loans.

The structure of subprime loans may lack features that traditionally provide borrower protections, such as clear disclosures of adjustable rate terms or caps on interest rate increases. Additionally, they may have prepayment penalties that can trap borrowers into unfavorable conditions. This lack of security and higher costs can lead to a greater risk of default for those who may already be financially vulnerable.

In contrast, conventional loans, FHA loans, and VA loans are designed with various consumer protections built into their terms. FHA and VA loans, in particular, have specific guidelines that promote fair practices and support borrowers through various forms of assistance, like lower down payment requirements and more flexible credit criteria.